Tuesday, October 6, 2015

JUDGE GERAGHTY AWARDS BENEFITS UNDER THE BLACK LUNG BENEFITS ACT

JUDGE GERAGHTY AWARDS BENEFITS UNDER THE BLACK LUNG BENEFITS ACT

In the Matter of: RAYMOND DAVIS, Claimant, v. ADVENT MINING, LLC., Employer, and ROCKWOOD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Carrier, and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS‟ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Party In Interest.

CASE NO.: 2012-BLA-05162

Issue Date: 25 September 2015


DECISION AND ORDER AWARDING BENEFITS 

This proceeding arises from a claim for benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (the “Act”) and the regulations issued thereunder, which are found in Title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Regulations referred to herein are contained in that Title. Benefits under the Act are awarded to coal miners who are totally disabled within the meaning of the Act due to pneumoconiosis, or to the survivors of coal miners whose death was due to pneumoconiosis. Pneumoconiosis, commonly known as “black lung,” is a disease of the lungs resulting from coal dust inhalation. Raymond Davis (“Claimant”) filed this claim for benefits on October 14, 2010. DX 4. On September 21, 2011, the District Director issued a proposed Decision and Order awarding benefits. DX 25. Advent Mining, LLC. (“Employer”) requested a formal hearing. DX 26. - 2 - This case was referred to the Office of Administrative Law Judges for a formal hearing. DX 29.1 Subsequently, the case was assigned to me. I issued a Notice of Hearing on February 6, 2015. The hearing was held before me in Owensboro, Kentucky on July 7, 2015, at which time the parties had full opportunity to present evidence and argument. The decision that follows is based upon an analysis of the record,2 the arguments of the parties,3 and the applicable law. 

CONCLUSION 

Claimant has met his burden of showing a change in an applicable condition of entitlement since the prior claim was denied. Upon de novo review of the entire record, I find that Claimant has established that he had fifteen years of underground coal mine employment, and that he is totally disabled by a pulmonary or respiratory impairment. Employer has failed to rebut the presumption that Claimant is totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis. Accordingly, Claimant is entitled to benefits under the Act. 

No comments:

Post a Comment